Budapest Liquidity Measure – BLM
Monthly average bid-ask spread and BLM values of blue-chips and BUX futures (30
day average)
Introduction
The Budapest Stock Exchange developed the Budapest Liquidity Measure in 2005
based on internationally recognised methodology. The measure quantifies different
dimensions of market liquidity of traded instruments.
The BLM describes liquidity from the most important point of view of investors:
it quantifies the implicit costs of the execution of an order when investors face
less liquid markets. Therefore, the more liquid an instrument, the lower the BLM
value, which means lower price paid for liquidity (lower implicit costs).
A market provides real liquidity if an order of any size can be immediately executed
at any time without having significant market impact.
Practical relevance
In many cases market shocks and crises take a form of liquidity crisis when prices
are falling sharply because order books dry up and investors can only close their
positions by creating huge negative market impact. Therefore, there is substantial
practical relevance of liquidity measures today:
Retail investors - Liquidity measures enable to make more thorough investment
decisions and to choose between different assets and markets by reducing risks
and costs. Liquidity measure is also a great tool to develop trading strategies.
Issuers – Liquidity measure helps to compare the effectiveness of different secondary
markets of their securities.
Institutional investors and brokerage firms – Liquidity measure can be used to
analyse liquidity, manage portfolios' liquidity risk, develop new trading techniques,
define the parameters of execution algorithms and analyse the transaction costs.
Methodology
The BLM quantifies the costs of liquidity based on the state of the order book
of the traded securities. A snapshot is taken of the order book at every second.
Based on that average prices are calculated at which orders of different sizes
could be executed. Orders of higher value can divert average price more, thus
resulting in higher implicit costs and BLM values.
BLM consists of two parts:
liquidity premium (LP): measured by the bid-ask spread , paid by the investors after each transaction
no matter how large the order size is;
adverse price movement (APM): orders of large value can not be executed at the best market price, therefore
part of the bid or ask quantity will be executed at worse price levels. In this
case the average execution price of the order will be less favourable than the
best market price in the original order book. That is what we call the adverse
price movement in case of larger order sizes.
BLM is calculated as the sum of the two factors above, the bid-ask spread and
the total roundtrip market impact.
Chart 1: Dimensions of the Budapest Liquidity Measure*

*The BLM is calculated not just for the best five price levels but for all the
price levels where any quantity is available.
Source: BSE, Deutsche Börse AG
The BLM is calculated in basis points simultaneously for five different order
sizes: EUR 20,000, EUR 40,000, EUR 100,000, EUR 200,000 and EUR 500,000. It indicates
the indirect cost of a transaction due to the above mentioned two factors.
A snapshot is taken of the order book at every second and average BLM values
can be calculated for longer time periods.
Interpretation of the BLM
The more liquid a security is the tighter and deeper its order book should be
which result in lower BLM values. For example a value of 100 basis points (1%)
for BLM (EUR 500,000) means that the immediate execution of a buy order for EUR
500,000 and the immediate execution of a sell order for the same size of the same
security will result in 1% less favourable average execution price for the client
compared to the mid-point price (the middle of the bid-ask spread). This 1% is
also called the implicit transaction cost, while an example for explicit transaction
cost is brokerage fee.
Example for the interpretation of BLM values: if the BLM equals to 50 bps (0.5%)
and the order size is EUR 20,000, then a good estimation of the implicit cost
of the transaction, which the investor has to take into account besides the brokerage
fee, is EUR 100. That is the result of an investor not being able to open a position
of EUR 20,000 at the mid-point price in the beginning of the trading day and then
closing it at the mid-point price by the end of the day. The implicit cost of
failing to execute at mid-point price reduces the profit of the transaction
Publication of BLM data
Statistics of monthly average bid-ask spread and BLM values for different order
sizes are available for equities’, investment fund notes’, certificates’ and BUX
futures’. More detailed database can be purchased through the information centre
of the BSE. Please, see conditions at the below link:
historical fee schedule
Related articles:
|
Cím
|
Fájl
|
|
Váradi, K. [2012]: Liquidity Risk on Stock Markets
|
download
|
|
Gyarmati, Á. - Michaletzky, M. - Váradi, K. [2011]: The Budapest Liquidity Measure
and its Application - Liquidity Risk in VaR measures
|
download
|
|
Gyarmati, Á. - Michaletzky, M. - Váradi, K. [2011]: Liquidity on the Budapest
Stock Exchange 2007-2010
|
download
|
Download statisitcs:
|
Title
|
File
|
|
Budapest Liquidity Measure - May 2013
|
download
|
|
Budapest Liquidity Measure - April 2013
|
download
|
|
Budapest Liquidity Measure - March 2013
|
download
|
|
Budapest Liquidity Measure - February 2013
|
download
|
|
Budapest Liquidity Measure - January 2013
|
download
|
|
Budapest Liquidity Measure - December 2012
|
download
|
|
Budapest Liquidity Measure - October 2012
|
download
|
|
Budapest Liquidity Measure - September 2012
|
download
|
|
Budapest Liquidity Measure - August 2012
|
download
|
|
Budapest Liquidity Measure - July 2012
|
download
|
|
Budapest Liquidity Measure - June 2012
|
download
|
|
Budapest Liquidity Measure - May 2012
|
download
|
|
Budapest Liquidity Measure - April 2012
|
download
|
|
Budapest Liquidity Measure - March 2012
|
download
|
|
Budapest Liquidity Measure - February 2012
|
download
|
|
Budapest Liquidity Measure - January 2012
|
download
|
|
Budapest Liquidity Measure - December 2011
|
download
|
|
Budapest Liquidity Measure - November 2011
|
download
|
|
Budapest Liquidity Measure - October 2011
|
download
|
|
Budapest Liquidity Measure - September 2011
|
download
|
|
Budapest Liquidity Measure - August 2011
|
download
|
|
Budapest Liquidity Measure - July 2011.
|
download
|
|
Budapest Liquidity Measure - June 2011.
|
download
|
|
Budapest Liquidity Measure - May 2011.
|
download
|
|
Budapest Liquidity Measure - Apr 2011.
|
download
|
|
Budapest Liquidity Measure - March 2011.
|
download
|
|
Budapest Liquidity Measure - February 2011.
|
download
|
|
Budapest Liquidity Measure - January 2011.
|
download
|
|
Budapest Liquidity Measure - December 2010.
|
download
|
|
Budapest Liquidity Measure - November 2010.
|
download
|
|
Budapest Liquidity Measure - October 2010.
|
download
|
|
Budapest Liquidity Measure - September 2010.
|
download
|
|
Budapest Liquidity Measure - August 2010.
|
download
|
|
Budapest Liquidity Measure - July 2010.
|
download
|
|
Budapest Liquidity Measure - June 2010.
|
download
|
|
Budapest Liquidity Measure - May 2010.
|
download
|
|
Budapest Liquidity Measure - April 2010.
|
download
|
|
Budapest Liquidity Measure - March 2010.
|
download
|
|
Budapest Liquidity Measure - February 2010.
|
download
|
|
Budapest Liquidity Measure - January 2010.
|
download
|
|
Budapest Liquidity Measure - December 2009.
|
download
|
|
Budapest Liquidity Measure - November 2009.
|
download
|
|
Budapest Liquidity Measure - October 2009.
|
download
|
|
Budapest Liquidity Measure - September 2009.
|
download
|
|
Budapest Liquidity Measure - August 2009.
|
download
|
|
Budapest Liquidity Measure - July 2009.
|
download
|
|
Budapest Liquidity Measure - June 2009.
|
download
|
|
Budapest Liquidity Measure - May 2009.
|
download
|
|
Budapest Liquidity Measure - April 2009.
|
download
|
|
Budapest Liquidity Measure - March 2009.
|
download
|
|
Budapest Liquidity Measure - February 2009.
|
download
|
|
Budapest Liquidity Measure - January 2009.
|
download
|
|
Budapest Liquidity Measure - December 2008.
|
download
|
|
Budapest Liquidity Measure - November 2008.
|
download
|
|
Budapest Liquidity Measure - October 2008.
|
download
|
|
Budapest Liquidity Measure - September 2008.
|
download
|
|
Budapest Liquidity Measure - August 2008.
|
download
|
|
Budapest Liquidity Measure - July 2008.
|
download
|
|
Budapest Liquidity Measure - June 2008.
|
download
|
|
Budapest Liquidity Measure - May 2008.
|
download
|
|
Budapest Liquidity Measure - April 2008.
|
download
|
|
Budapest Liquidity Measure - March 2008.
|
download
|
|
Budapest Liquidity Measure - February 2008.
|
download
|
|
Budapest Liquidity Measure - January 2008.
|
download
|
|
Budapest Liquidity Measure - December 2007.
|
download
|
|
Budapest Liquidity Measure - November 2007.
|
download
|
|
Budapest Liquidity Measure - October 2007.
|
download
|
|
Budapest Liquidity Measure - September 2007.
|
download
|
|
Budapest Liquidity Measure - August 2007.
|
download
|
|
Budapest Liquidity Measure - July 2007.
|
download
|
|
Budapest Liquidity Measure - June 2007.
|
download
|
|
Budapest Liquidity Measure - May 2007.
|
download
|
|
Budapest Liquidity Measure - April 2007.
|
download
|
|
Budapest Liquidity Measure - March 2007.
|
download
|
|
Budapest Liquidity Measure - February 2007.
|
download
|
|
Budapest Liquidity Measure - January 2007.
|
download
|